Write discussion scientific paper

Write discussion scientific paper

22/6/ · The discussion section of a scientific paper is probably the hardest section to write. Authors must highlight their findings but not overstate their relevance. They must introduce other studies for comparison and give their own results context. In many cases, authors also must highlight the limitations of their work and then give readers a 29/11/ · Rules for Writing a Discussion Write down the response of each result, but not rewrite the data. Use references that belong to you, your colleagues, or other parties. Write down the facts of the results, but don’t be hyperbolic. Avoid writing non-specific expressions, such as “higher temperature” 18/3/ · Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your Use the same Cited by: 1

8 Tips for Writing a Scientific Discussion That's Authoritative

The next big write discussion scientific paper is writing a scientific discussion. It is the last part of your paper, in which you summarize your findings in light of the current literature. You also need to write discussion scientific paper in on how your work will move the field forward and what questions remain, write discussion scientific paper. Unlike the abstractthe discussion does not have a broad readership per se, but is written for both beginners to that particular area of science and experts of the same.

So, what do you need to do to make the scientific discussion section a success? This is the first thing that you need to do when writing a scientific discussion section. Describe very briefly the conclusion from your results, and then explain what it means with respect to what is already known. Remember to emphasize how your results support or refute the current hypotheses in the field, if any. This is also a good place to address if your data conflict with what is established in the field.

Be sure to advocate for your findings and underline how your results significantly move the field forward.

In this section, explain any limitations that your hypothesis or experimental approach might have and the reasoning behind them. This will help the field in generating hypotheses and new approaches without facing the same challenges, write discussion scientific paper.

The discussion becomes well rounded when you emphasize not only the impact of the study but also where it may fall short. Nonetheless, you should think about the questions that your study might lead to while you are writing the discussion, write discussion scientific paper. Consider posing a few questions, preferably in the form of a hypothesis, to provide a launchpad for future research. Now that write discussion scientific paper have talked about the important features of an authoritative discussion section, here are a few pointers about things to avoid.

You can open the discussion with a sentence that contains a snapshot of the main conclusion, but make sure you stop right there! Rather, swiftly transition into what these results mean and their impact. I mentioned giving your results their proper due and underscoring their significance.

But be careful not to extrapolate your results and interpret something that is beyond the scope of the study. Keep in mind the difference between what your results suggest at a given point versus what more can be known from them.

You can do this by asking more questions and applying other experimental approaches. Present all of your data in the results section. Although readers of your field would probably understand the jargon, minimize its use to make your paper accessible to a broader audience and to enable a larger impact. Try and use plain English. In a nutshell, remember that the primary goal of writing a scientific discussion is to accentuate your results.

Therefore, take the time to ensure that it is well rounded, succinct, and relevant. Originally published December 7, Reviewed and updated on December 22, Has this helped you? Then please share with your network. I use Mega 7 to align raw sequence primer forward and reverse, where the nucleotide sequence to start cutting weight and stop taking the final part of the sequence. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More. Written by Suryatapa Ghosh. Image Credit: Ettore. Masri on May 23, at am.

Hi I use Mega 7 to align raw sequence primer forward and reverse, where the nucleotide sequence to start cutting weight and stop taking the final part of the sequence. thank You. hahaa on October 2, at pm. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More Networks.

Share via. Facebook Messenger. Copy Link. Copy link. Copy Copied.

Results, Discussion Conclusion chapters

, time: 17:55

How to Write a Strong Discussion in Scientific Manuscripts

18/3/ · Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your Use the same Cited by: 1 1/10/ · Writing a "good" discussion section • Present principles, relationships and generalizations shown by the results • Point out exceptions or lack of correlations. Define why you think this is so. • Show how your results agree or disagree with previously published works • Discuss the theoretical Author: John Sisson 29/11/ · Rules for Writing a Discussion Write down the response of each result, but not rewrite the data. Use references that belong to you, your colleagues, or other parties. Write down the facts of the results, but don’t be hyperbolic. Avoid writing non-specific expressions, such as “higher temperature”